Vivisection (or experimental animal) experiments are "scientific" than in animals that are to be brutally cruel little unsure, since what may be harmless to an animal and can be toxic to humans as is often done in the past and present, and that's why toxicity tests are "tested" on various animal species the results are different, but which of these results be taken into account? Perhaps what is most ' comfortable that the industry will have to sell the product. Then you will understand that there are certain scientific data so that we can achieve the same results on humans! addition to expressing toxicity on the animals they are also carried out other fact we see that: 30% of these relates to the field drug (to create a drug, in fact, must by law test on animals, although there is a large number of researchers who question the scientific validity of these procedures and to clearly support they serve the economic interests more than to real research.
However the drugs for their "true" science is not only tested on animals, but before they are marketed to all intents and purposes this should also be tested on humans in fact unconsciously we are all guinea pigs!).
70% is used instead of cosmetic products (cosmetics are used for rabbits which are fed with power in their stomach chemicals that we know more commonly as and the name of: shampoo shaving cream, etc.), WAR! (Every day in many countries, in the laboratories, especially those of the armed forces of the United States, are locked up thousands of animals of each species that are forced to sacrifice their lives in the name of a "war" that will not and will not win them! Therefore Verification military is very difficult to know just know that the "armed forces" tried all sorts of weaponry on animals such as biological and chemical warfare agents in nuclear blasts last but not least the military experiments can be intensely painful, repetitive, expensive and unreliable.)
addition vivisection tests are being conducted in universities for students' experiments (even if a law allows the student to refrain from the following experiments.)
But who can sell a large number of animals for the experiment is completed? the answer is simple animals for vivisection, not only suffer terribly from the torments that you do, just think of cutting the vocal cords to prevent them from screaming, but also because these find themselves torn away from their natural environment to end up in a cage often small and dark (you'll understand the emotional abuse in addition to physical).
animals used for "research" also vary depending on the areas to which they address: the most commonly used as guinea pigs, in general, mice are then used in surgery are pigs in cosmetics (as mentioned earlier) the rabbits, for drugs generally are used dogs, cats and monkeys.
Who financially supports this torture?
Scientific research is funded by private funds derived from acts of charity (such as Telethon, AIRC, AISM ANLAIDS), and is (in) voluntarily with our pockets by paying taxes because each state finances "its" vivisection.
The "proceeds" is spent on economic research in two ways the first is one that requires more money (and it is obviously useless to society and at the same scientific progress), since it is based only on disease, "fake "or better on the diseases which the man does not suffer (but not animals!), in fact this kind of research based his experiments on anatomical or functional alterations in the animal, radiation exposure (which usually hurt the man let alone a mouse), the injection of chemicals and gas etc..
So much of this money is not spent to make a true "SEARCH" to help real sick, but just to maintain a certain economic status and a certain prestige to the "popular scientists" to However, the remainder of the money is instead intended for real medical research (the second type of research) that the experiments based only on the development of new technologies for early diagnosis (as it should be in the 21 century), they do not practice vivisection for test their medicines, products, etc., even these researchers' antivivisection "showed important arguments to justify their opposition to animal testing is a ethical point of view, as cruel and immoral, and a point scientifically because it is just a waste of time, money, and resources that could esser'meglio used.
Although it is known that vivisection is' useless as SCIENCE, continues because this is of great economic interest for many mad scientists, pharmaceutical companies, scientific journals and universities,
is horrible to come aware that millions of innocent victims of the animals (pre-) powerful are the real criminals do all this for only $ OLDI!
boycott Inula MASSACRE!
BOYCOTT Vivisection!
